LAW OF PRIVATE DEFENSE
SELF DEFENSE WHY? Nowadays we see violence attack on Hindus, in West Bengal, Jammu and Kashmir and so on. Hindus are submissive by nature and do not believe in violence. Peace is their religion, and inner peace is their yog. But now with increase in violence on Hindus, there is a hot discussion whether we can keep arms with us for self -defence? I feel its just not due to such incidents like Pahalgam but in general, all children must be trained in self-defence from school. It should be compulsory in curriculum. ARMS ACT 1959 So lets start to learn the legal provisions. One cannot keep arms with him/her. Why? Because they are governed by Arms Act 1959. “arms” means articles of any description designed or adapted as weapons for offense or defense, and includes firearms, sharp-edged and other deadly weapons, and parts of, and machinery for manufacturing, arms, but does not include articles designed solely for domestic or agricultural uses such as a lathi or an ordinary walking stick and weapons incapable of being used otherwise than as toys or of being converted into serviceable weapons; Here we are not talking about ammunition. Which is very dangerous like bombs, rockets, grenades etc. To possess arms, one requires license under Sec 3 of said Arms Act. Certain arms and ammunition are totally prohibited under the said Act. Now let us see which arms are permissible under the law or can say are out of reach of Arms Act. Gun with License, however, certain firearms and ammunition, such as those of .303, 7.62mm, 9mm, and .455 bore, are prohibited and not available for civilian ownership. Pepper Spray is legal in India for self-defence, stun gun, telescopic baton, lipstick stun gun, electroshock weapon, flashlights, red pepper gel spray. Difference between Self-Defense and Private Defense: While self-defense primarily focuses on personal protection, private defense extends to protecting others or one’s belongings. The principles of proportionality and reasonableness in using force also apply to private defense. The right to protect oneself, others, or property from harm or unlawful aggression. The terms “self-defense” and “private defense” are essentially synonymous in Indian law. They refer to the right to use force to protect one’s own body, or the body and property of another, against an immediate threat. While the terms are used interchangeably, “private defence” is sometimes used to encompass a broader range of situations, including defending others or one’s property, in addition to self-defense BNS Act 2023 provides Private Defence as under: RIGHT OF PRIVATE DEFENSE Nothing is an offense which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence. Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 37, to defend— (a) his own body, and the body of any other person, against any offence affecting the human body; (b) the property, whether movable or immovable, of himself or of any other person, against any act which is an offence falling under the definition of theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass, or which is an attempt to commit theft, robbery, mischief or criminal trespass. When an act, which would otherwise […]
Read more
WHETHER COURT HAS POWER TO AMEND THE ARBITRATION AWARD? CAN COURT REVIEW PENDING BILL BEFORE PARLIAMENT?
Recently, this query was referred to 5-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in the matter of Gayatri Balasamy The facts of the case and the reference points are as under: Gayatri Balasamy vs M/S Isg Novasoft Technologies Limited on 30 April, 2025 This reference to a Bench of five judges is primarily to decide the correctness of the judgment of this Court in Project Director, National Highways No. 45 E and 220 National Highways Authority of India Vs. M. Hakeem and Anr., (2021) 9 SCC 1. In the said judgment, this Court held that while exercising powers under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘A&C Act’ for short), a Court hearing the petition had no power to “Modify” the Award. A three- Judge Bench of this Court on 20.02.2024, after noticing that there are decisions of this Court which have either modified the awards of the Arbitral Tribunals or upheld orders challenging modified awards and after observing that an authoritative pronouncement is required on this issue, placed the matter before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for constitution of an appropriate Bench. On 23.01.2025, by an order, this Court directed the matter to be placed before a Constitution Bench and that is how the matter has presented itself. THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS OF LAW WERE REFERRED TO A LARGER BENCH: “1. Whether, the powers of the Court under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 will include the power to modify an arbitral award? If the power to modify the award is available, whether such power can be exercised only where the award is severable, and a part thereof can be modified? Whether the power to set aside an award under Section 34 of the Act, being a larger power, will include the power to modify an arbitral award and if so, to what extent? Whether the power to modify an award can be read into the power to set aside an award under Section 34 of the Act? Whether the judgment of this Court in Project Director NHAI vs. M. Hakeem (2021) 9 SCC 1, followed in Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigeration company vs. Union of India, (2023) SCC OnLine SC 982 and SV Samudram vs. State of Karnataka, (2024) SCC OnLine SC 19 lay down the correct law, as other benches of two Judges (in Vedanta Limited vs. Shenzden Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Company Limited, (2019) 11 SCC 465, Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Kerala, (2021) 6 SCC 150 and M.P. Power Generation Co. Ltd. vs. Ansaldo Energia Spa, (2018) 16 SCC 661 and three Judges (in J.C. Budhraja vs. Chairman, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. (2008) 2 SCC 444, Tata Hydroelectric Power Supply Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India, (2003) 4 SCC 172 and Shakti Nath vs. Alpha Tiger Cyprus Investment No.3 Ltd., (2020) 11 SCC (a) The Courts exercising power under Section 34 and Courts hearing appeals thereunder have no power to “modify” an award. (b) The power to modify is not a lesser power to that of the power to set aside, as the two operate in separate […]
Read more
Are Governors of States bound by orders of court in India?
CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS OF GOVERNOR IN INDIA Let us first see the provision. Article 154 in Constitution of India Executive power of State (1) The executive power of the State shall be vested in the Governor and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution. (2) Nothing in this article shall– (a)be deemed to transfer to the Governor any functions conferred by any existing law on any other authority; or (b)prevent Parliament or the Legislature of the State from conferring by law functions on any authority subordinate to the Governor. Now we go to next Article 175 Right of Governor to address and send messages to the House or Houses (1)The Governor may address the Legislative Assembly or, in the case of a State having a Legislative Council, either House of the Legislature of the State, or both Houses assembled together, and may for that purpose require the attendance of members. (2)The Governor may send messages to the House or Houses of the Legislature of the State, whether with respect to a Bill then pending in the Legislature or otherwise, and a House to which any message is so sent shall with all convenient dispatch consider any matter required by the message to be taken into consideration. Assent to Bills When a Bill has been passed by the Legislative Assembly of a State or, in the case of a State having a Legislative Council, has been passed by both Houses of the Legislature of the State, it shall be presented to the Governor and the Governor shall declare either that he assents to the Bill or that he withholds assent therefrom or that he reserves the Bill for the consideration of the President: Provided that the Governor may, as soon as possible after the presentation to him of the Bill for assent, return the Bill if it is not a Money Bill together with a message requesting that the House or Houses will reconsider the Bill or any specified provisions thereof and, in particular, will consider the desirability of introducing any such amendments as he may recommend in his message and, when a Bill is so returned, the . House or Houses shall reconsider the Bill accordingly, and if the Bill is passed again by the House or Houses with or without amendment and presented to the Governor for assent, the Governor shall not withhold assent therefrom: Provided further that the Governor shall not assent to, but shall reserve for the consideration of the President, any Bill which in the opinion of the Governor would, if it became law, so derogate from the powers of the High Court as to endanger the position which that Court is by this Constitution designed to fill. Comments: Do you notice there is no time limit provided within which a Governor has to sign a Bill. Why? Constituent Assembly on Signing of Bill: This issue was discussed in detail in the Constituent Assembly. Following are excerpts A detailed discussion was held in the Constituent Assembly. I reproduce below the excerpt of the discussion and why […]
Read more
THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE (IBC) AND THE STATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (SRA) CAN HAVE CONFLICTS IN HOW THEY HANDLE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY.
The Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) are different frameworks that are used to address housing issues and insolvency. Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) A PPP scheme that encourages private developers to invest in slum rehabilitation projects The Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) oversees, coordinates, and approves the SRS The SRS offers extra Floor Square Index (FSI) to developers in exchange for their investment Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) A structured framework that helps resolve insolvencies The IBC aims to recover maximum asset value and resolve distressed entities quickly. The IBC has a stipulated resolution time of 330 days, including litigations POWERS OF SRA Attachment of property The SRA (Slum Rehabilitation Authority) may want to attach property under the PMLA, but the IBC’s Section 32A protects property from confiscation. Pre-CIRP electricity dues The SRA shouldn’t be held liable for pre-CIRP electricity dues once a resolution plan is approved. Stay of acquisition process The RP may want to stay the SRA’s acquisition process, but the HC ruled that the IBC doesn’t allow staying the operation of another law remove defaulting developers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). How the SRA can pursue avoidance applications If the Resolution Plan gives the SRA the power to pursue avoidance applications, then the SRA can do so. The SRA can pursue avoidance applications that were filed by the erstwhile Administrator and are pending before the NCLT. How the IBC prevails over other laws The IBC’s Section 238 states that the IBC prevails over other laws in cases of conflict. In the case of Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Mahesh Bansal, the NCLT ruled that the IBC’s Section 7 can be applied even if there are proceedings pending under other laws. The IBC is a more recent special legislation, so it prevails over earlier laws. However, the IBC is a special legislation that prevails over other laws, including the SRA, in cases of conflict. the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016 prevails over other laws if there is a conflict, according to Section 238 of the IBC. This means that the IBC takes precedence over any other law, including state enactments. How IBC prevails over other laws. Section 238 includes a “non-obstante clause” that neutralizes any contrary provisions. The IBC’s provisions have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent with any other law. The IBC’s overriding effect has been upheld by the Supreme Court. Examples of IBC overriding other laws: In Leo Edibles & Fats Ltd v. the Income-tax Department, the court ruled that the IBC overrides the Income Tax Act when determining dues during liquidation. In Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Limited v Hotel Gaudavan Private Limited and Others, the Supreme Court ruled that the IBC prevails over state enactments. BUT SLUM LAW AND IBC VIEW OF COURT IS AS UNDER: The provisions of the IBC are not meant to defeat slum redevelopment and similar or allied statutes. To hold otherwise would simply be unthinkable. It would mean that a Writ Court would put a premium on corporate wrongdoing and that even a defaulting corporate debtor who had not complied with the terms of a LoI […]
Read more
SETTING ASIDE AND OR MODIFICATION OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD SHOULD BE PERMITTED?
The above issue is sub-judice in the matter of GAYATRI BALASAMY Versus M/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED| SLP(C) No. 15336-15337/2021 While writing this blog there is no intention to impress upon views but this is just a small educational analysis. I am not in possession of the reference papers but expressing my views on Section. 33 of the Act. This I am writing solely on basis on press reports available. Let us first see the concerned provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act 1996. Once the Award is made affecting party has remedy under Section 34 of the said 1996 for setting aside the Award. It reads as under: CHAPTER VII Recourse against arbitral award (1) Recourse to a Court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting aside such award in accordance with sub-section (2) and sub-section (3). (2) An arbitral award may be set aside by the Court only if– (a) the party making the application 1[establishes on the basis of the record of the arbitral tribunal that]– (i) a party was under some incapacity, or (ii) the arbitration agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law for the time being in force; or (iii) the party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or (iv) the arbitral award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration: Provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, only that part of the arbitral award which contains decisions on matters not submitted to arbitration may be set aside; or (v) the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, unless such agreement was in conflict with a provision of this Part from which the parties cannot derogate, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with this Part; or (b) the Court finds that– (i) the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law for the time being in force, or (ii) the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India. 1[Explanation 1.–For the avoidance of any doubt, it is clarified that an award is in conflict with the public policy of India, only if,– (i) the making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of section 75 or section 81; or (ii) it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or (iii) it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice. Explanation 2.–For the avoidance of doubt, the test as to whether there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall not entail a review on the merits of […]
Read more
FORFEITURE AND WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT TO BUY A FLAT
BLANKET CONSENT An agreement with the builder includes pre-printed clauses that secure the interests of the promoter or builder. In a way it’s a business because the promoter is investing huge sums of money, and he wants its security. Godrej Projects Development Limited vs Anil Karlekar on 3 February, 2025 A question arose in the matter of Godrej Properties at Gurgaon, Haryana. Mr. A books a flat and pays a sum of Rs.51 lakhs approx. But upon issuing letter of allotment, the buyer instead of taking possession of the flat agreed he opted for cancellation of the Agreement. He cited the recession in the real estate industry and sought a full refund of the money. A legal notice was served and subsequently flat buyer filed a consumer complaint. The NCDRC disposed of the Consumer Complaint by directing the Appellant to deduct only 10% of the BSP ( Base Sale Price) only towards cancellation of the Complainants’ Apartment and refund the balance amount Rs.34 lakhs along with simple interest @ 6% per annum from the date of each payment till the date of refund within three months. The standard clause in the purchase agreement was : Agreement entered into between the Parties, which read thus: “2.6 It has been specifically agreed between the Parties that, 20% of the Basic Sale Price, shall be considered and treated as earnest money under this Agreement (“Earnest Money”), to ensure the performance, compliance and fulfillment of the obligations and responsibilities of the Buyer under this Agreement. It has been made clear by the Developer and the Buyer has understood that the Sale Consideration and Statutory Charges as mentioned in Schedule VI hereto have been computed on the basis of Super Built Up Area of the Apartment. The Buyer agrees that the calculation of Super Built Up Area in respect of the Apartment is tentative at this stage and subject to variations till the Completion of Construction. In case such variations are beyond +/- 5%, then the Developer shall take prior consent of the Buyer. 8.4 On and from the date of such termination on account of Buyer’s Event of Default as mentioned above (“Termination Date”), the Parties mutually agree that- (i) The Developer shall, out of the entire amounts paid by the Buyer to the Developer till the Termination Date, forfeit the entire Earnest Money and any other dues payable by the Buyer including interest on delayed payments as specified in this Agreement. (ii) After the said forfeiture, the Developer shall refund the balance amount to the Buyer or to his banker/financial institution, as the case may be, without any interest; (iii) On and from the Termination Date, the Buyer shall be left with no right, title, interest, claim, lien, authority whatsoever either in respect of the Apartment or under this Agreement and the Developer shall be released and discharged of all its liabilities and obligations under this Agreement. (iv) On and from the Termination Date, the Developer shall be entitled, without any claim or interference of the Buyer, to convey, sell, transfer and/or assign the Apartment in favour of third party(ies) or otherwise deal […]
Read more
LIVING WILL- EUTHENESIA
RIGHT TO DIE WITH DIGNITY A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT IN INDIA? It is easy to live but difficult to die. Life is lived on hope … Than why we are studying Living Will and Euthenesia? What is Euthanasia? It’s a the practice (most countries have not legalized) of killing somebody without pain who wants to die because he/she is suffering from a disease that cannot be cured. We will see this in detail hereinafter discussing Supreme Court Judgments. In India euthanasia was not permitted. Though practice of SATI was prevalent in India, A widow would jump in pyre of her husband as in Hindu religion marriage is not contract but a relationship for 7 births. So, marriage ceremony is also called saptapadi. The SATI practice was banned The Bengal Sati Regulation or Regulation XVII, A. D. 1829 of the Bengal Code was a legal act promulgated in British India under East India Company rule, by the then Governor-General Lord William Bentinck. The act made the practice of sati—or the immolation of a Hindu widow on the funeral pyre of her deceased husband—declared illegal in all jurisdictions of British India and subject to legal prosecution by Britishers. Subsequently Raja Rammohan Roy in played remarkable role in transformation in the social ideas in the History of India. Age old ‘Sati system’, i.e., burning of Widow in her dead husband’s funeral pyre which existed in India was abolished due to the effort of Raja Ram Mohan Roy He was the founder of Brahmo samaj and he also played a vital role in the abolition of Polygamy and Child marriage in India. Another practice in India was of Johar. Sati and Johar are not the same. Johar was self-immolation practiced in Rajasthan to save chastity by women from Mughals and attackers. Well, these are not in stricto sensu can be called euthanasia but a living death for dignity of woman which was part of religious practice. The last documented case of sati in India was in the year 2008, when Lalmati Verma, a 75-year-old woman, jumped into her husband’s funeral pyre after mourners had left the cremation site. Here are some other recent cases of sati: 2006 : Vidyawati, a 35-year-old woman, allegedly jumped into her husband’s funeral pyre in Rari-Bujurg Village, Uttar Pradesh 2006 : Janakrani, a 40-year-old woman, burned to death on her husband’s funeral pyre in Sagar district 2002 : Kuttu, a 65-year-old woman, died after sitting on her husband’s funeral pyre in Panna district of Madhya Pradesh 1987 : case of Roop Kanwar, India passed additional legislation against sati was passed namely The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987 is a law in India that aims to prevent the practice of sati and the glorification of it: Purpose The act prevents the voluntary or forced burning or burying alive of a widow. It also prohibits actions that glorify sati, such as ceremonies, processions, financial trusts, temples, or other actions that honour the memory of a widow who committed sati. Punishment The act punishes anyone who glorifies sati with imprisonment of at least one year and up to seven years, and a […]
Read more
CAN WE TRANSFER A FLAT IN A HOUSING SOCIETY WITHOUT OBTAINING A PROBATE? IF YES HOW?
A person generates wealth for his survival, comfort and luxury. He earns wealth for growth of his family and children. When becomes old same children start talking of inheritance of his wealth while he is living. There are various provisions of law to bequeath property : a. after death of a person, which is WILL or Vasiyat. When you make a WILL your inheritance is governed by Indian Succession Act 1925. This is very common practice and people always make WILL during their lifetime. This WILL or Vasiyat operates or say becomes live after death of make of WILL. This is where entire drawback or lacuna lies. Court even permits registered WILL in a way rewrites last wish of the deceased. Is it correct to do that? Once challenge to the WILL is permitted the Probate application is converted into Suit. Which takes decades to come up for hearing. Resultant the parties to avoid litigation and waste of time settle the claim in most of the matters. The question arises is whether this was the last wish of the deceased? Answer is No. But it happens. b. Next is inheritance governed by personal law. i. For Hindus its Hindu Succession Act 1956. There are two school of thoughts Dayabhaga which is prevalent in West Bengal where son gets inheritance in fathers property only on death of the father. While in rest of India Mitakshara School of Law is followed. In this a child in the womb gets coparcenary rights in the family property. c. Hindu WILL requires to be probated. ii. Islamic Law 1. The Holy Quran 2. The Sunna – that is, the practice of the Prophet 3. The Ijma – that is, the consensus of the learned men of the community on what should be the decision on a particular point 4. The Qiya – that is, an analogical deduction of what is right and just in accordance with the good principles laid down by God. Muslim law recognizes two types of heirs, Sharers and Residuary. Sharers are the ones who are entitled to a certain share in the deceased’s property and Residuary would take up the share in the property that is left over after the sharers have taken their part. A will executed by a Muslim testator is not subject to the compulsory probate requirements under law. This would be a subject matter of Mohammedan personal law (which differs in its application among Shias and Sunnis). However they do file for probate for transfer of plot of land and other properties in Mumbai. d. In case of a Parsi section 213 (2) of the Indian Succession Act 1925 states that in case of a Parsi dying after the commencement of the Act, a probate is necessary if the WILL in question is made or the property bequeathed under the WILL is situated within the “ordinary original civil jurisdiction” of the Bombay high court. e. For WILL made by a Christian probate is not mandatory under Indian Succession Act 1956. COMMENTS: To obtain probate it takes long-time. Now a days 3-4 years even if not contested. So, […]
Read more
LEAKING A VIDEO OF AN OFFICER COUNTING BALLOT PAPERS DURING THE VOTING PROCESS OF CHANDIGARH MUNICIPALITY TO SOCIAL MEDIA IS IN BREACH OF DATA PRIVACY?
Data privacy is a law and it’s in force. It came into force on 11th August 2023. Recently an election process was held for electing a Mayor in Chandigarh Municipality. The issue started with Presiding Officer Anil Mansinh looking at surveillance camera and mainly ruling Aam Adami Party lost Mayoral post. Hence an issue is raised that returning officer defaced the ballot papers. The AAP approached the Supreme Court and upon seeing the video a judgment is drawn that returning officer Anil Mansinh tempered the ballot paper. There are two issues: The video presented in court is available on social media platform and all are interpreting the way they want. This is breach of #dataprivacy. How we will discuss here. Can court become judgmental by declaring returning officer guilty without scrutinizing the records? Is court pre-decisive and judgmental in this case? DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: [A] The video presented in court is available on social media platform and all are interpreting the way they want. This is breach of #dataprivacy. While answering point No.i let us go back to recent history of constitution bench judgment in which current CJI was a part of it. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2017), also known as the Right to Privacy verdict, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, held that, the right to privacy is protected as a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. A nine-judge bench of J. S. Khehar, J. Chelameswar, S. A. Bobde, R. K. Agrawal, R. F. Nariman, A. M. Sapre, D. Y. Chandrachud, S. K. Kaul, and S. A. Nazeer unanimously held that “the right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution.” It explicitly overruled previous judgements of the Supreme Court in Kharak Singh vs. State of UP and M.P. Sharma vs. Union of India, which held that there is no fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution. This judgment settled this position of law and clarified that the Right to Privacy could be infringed upon only when there was a compelling state interest in doing so. This position was the same as with the other fundamental rights . Supreme Court ruled that Right to Privacy is “intrinsic to life and personal liberty” and is inherently protected under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution. DATA PROTECTION: Central Government passed an Act to provide for the processing of digital personal data in a manner that recognises both the right of individuals to protect their personal data and the need to process such personal data for lawful purposes and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The definition of the term data under this Act is as under : (h) “data” means a representation of information, facts, concepts, opinions or instructions in a manner suitable for communication, interpretation or processing by human beings or by […]
Read more
WHEN A CRIMINAL MATTER IS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER STATE HIGH COURT THEN WHETHER COURT OF ORIGIN LOSES POWER AND JURISDICTION TO TRY AND ENTERTAIN REMISSION APPLICATION ?
BILKIS BANU JUDGEMENT AN ANALYSIS Yesterday two Judges bench passed an order setting aside remission given by the Gujarat High Court on the recommendation of the Gujarat Government under Section 432 (7) (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure 1973 in the matter of Bilkis Banu vs Union of India. But there is different view of 5 Judges Constitution Bench in Murugan Vs Union of India . This law needs more clarification. Brief History : These writ petitions was filed assailing the Orders dated 10.08.2022, granting remission and early release of respondent Nos.3 to 13 in Writ Petition (Crl.) No.491 of 2022 (which petition shall be considered to be the lead petition), who were all convicted, having been found guilty of committing heinous crimes during the large-scale riots in Gujarat on 28.02.2002 and a few days thereafter which occurred in the aftermath of the burning of the train incident in Godhra in the State of Gujarat on 27.02.2002. The crime in question was driven by communal hatred and resulted in twelve convicts, amongst many Writ Petition (Crl.) No.491 of 2022 Etc. others, brutally gang-raping the petitioner in Writ Petition (Crl.) No.491 of 2022, namely, Bilkis Yakub Rasool, who was pregnant at that time. Further, the petitioner’s mother was gang raped and murdered, her cousin who had just delivered a baby was also gang raped and murdered. Eight minors including the petitioner’s cousin’s two-day-old infant were also murdered. The petitioner’s three-year-old daughter was murdered by smashing her head on a rock, her two minor brothers, two minor sisters, her phupha, phupi,mama (uncle, aunt and uncle respectively) and three-cousins were all murdered. Cause of Action Bilkis Yakub Rasool, being an unfortunate victim of the heinous crimes filed the writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ, order, or direction quashing the Orders dated 10.08.2022 passed by the State of Gujarat by which the convicts in Sessions Case No.634 of 2004, Mumbai (respondent Nos.3 to 13 herein), whose convictions were upheld by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court and thereafter by Supreme Court. On 28.06.2022, the Department of Home Affairs, Government of Gujarat, addressed a letter to the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, seeking sanction from the Government of India on the proposal for the premature release of the prisoners, respondent Nos.3 to 13. By letter dated 11.07.2022, the Ministry of Home Affairs, The government of India conveyed its approval under Section 435 of the CrPC for the premature release of all 11 convicts, respondent Nos.3 to 13. Pursuant to the concurrence of the Central Government, the State of Gujarat issued the impugned orders dated 10.08.2022. In the above background, writ petitions were filed, praying, inter-alia, for issuance of a writ, order, or direction, quashing the Orders dated 10.08.2022 LEGAL ISSUE INVOLVED It was asserted inter-alia that though the crime was committed in the State of Gujarat, the investigation and trial were carried out in the State of Maharashtra under the orders of this Court. Hence, given the language of Section 432(7)(b), only the state of Maharashtra would be the appropriate […]
Read more