PRESIDENT’S POWER TO ADJUDICATE UPON ELECTION PETITION
Why we are discussing this issue? Opening Remarks: In 2024 Lok Sabha general election was held in May. This was the 18th Lok Sabha election. All political parties offered in manifesto many promises. Freebies are offered by almost all political parties. In Delhi the local state government is sworn in thrice based on freebies. Similarly in Karnataka and Telangana the state government is elected based on freebies. The disadvantage of such freebies is the economy of the State is pulled back due to nonproductive expenses. The taxpayers do not get more advance facilities from the tax they have paid. PIL challenging freebies is pending before the Supreme Court. During Lok Sabha election we saw that one of the parties Congress have distributed a guaranteed cards along with the forms that if they come to power, they will give Rs.8500/- to every woman and Rs.1,000,00/- per year to meet major expenses. This party has won more seats than last two elections and there was religious concentration of votes. There was also a statement that the party if come to power would confiscate entire wealth and do caste survey and thereafter redistribute the same. The congress party won 99 Lok Sabha seats. However, they are in power in three states. Telangana, Himachal and Karnataka. They can offer them. But women who were given guarantee cards along with form started Queuing up outside Congress Party offices. They said we have lost. The question arise now is whether this is a blatant fraud? What does law say? The law which governs election is the Representation of peoples Act 1951 ( Said RP Act 1951) The question is whether all this statements go against the provisions of Section 123 of RP Act 1951 ? A complaint is pending before the President of India challenging election. Now question arises Can third party challenge in representative character the election of candidates who belong to a single largest party who won election on basis of guaranteed card? Who has jurisdiction to hear the election Petition under Section 123 and 8A of RP Act 1951? Does President of India have power under Section 123 or 8 A of the said R.P. Act 1951? This Act came into force on 17th July 1951. Preamble of the Act explains the purpose of its enactment. An Act to provide for the conduct of elections to the Houses of Parliament and to the House or Houses of the Legislature of each State, the qualifications and disqualifications for membership of those Houses, the corrupt 1*** practices and other offences at or in connection with such elections and the decision of doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with such elections. The terms corrupt practices is defined in the Act as “corrupt practice means any of the practices specified in section 123” What does corrupt practices mean. Section 123 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides for the same. Corrupt practices.— The following shall be deemed to be corrupt practices for the purposes of this Act:— (1)“Bribery”, that is to say— (A) any gift, offer or promise by a candidate […]
Read more
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MAKER OF THE WILL DIRECTS TO PAY THE EXECUTOR FROM A PARTICULAR FUND? CAN COURT ISSUE A PROBATE?
To understand the case query we must first learn the provisions of the Indian Succession Act of 1925 IS AN EXECUTOR A TRUSTEE? “There is a distinction between a trustee and an executor, in that the former has only the power to pay what is vested in him as trustee to the persons for whose use he holds it, but has no general power to receive and pay what is due to and from the estate, which is the office of the latter (vide paragraph 13, p. 12 of Williams). The same proposition appears in Halsbury’s Laws of England (3rd Edn., Vol. 16, p. 124, in paragraph 180)” Provisions of Indian Succession Act 1925 Sec 222: Probate only to appoint an executor. (1) Probate shall be granted only to an executor appointed by the will. (2) The appointment may be expressed or by necessary implication. Illustrations (i) A wills that C be his executor if B will not. B is appointed executor by implication. (ii) A gives a legacy to B and several legacies to other persons, among the rest to his daughter-in-law C, and adds “but should the within-named C be not living I do constitute and appoint B my whole and sole executrix”. C is appointed executrix by implication. (iii) A appoints several persons executors of his will and codicils and his nephew residuary legatee, and in another codicil are these words,– “I appoint my nephew my residuary legatee to discharge all lawful demands against my will and codicils signed of different dates”. The nephew is appointed an executor by implication. Grant of administration of universal or residuary legatees.— When—(a)the deceased has made a Will, but has not appointed an executor, or (b)the deceased has appointed an executor who is legally incapable or refuses to act, or who has died before the testator or before he has proved the Will, or (c)the executor dies after having proved the will, but before he has administered all the estate of the deceased, a universal or a residuary legatee may be admitted proving the Will and letters of administration with the Will annexed may be granted to him of the whole estate, or of so much thereof as may be unadministered. Narration: Thus, the test for finding out whether a person is an executor according to the tenor is to find out whether he is, by necessary implication, nominated by the testator in his stead to generally administer the estate and to pay the testator’s debts and to receive his dues in the performance of his will. An executor is placed in the stead of the testator and he has the right of action against the testator’s debtors and has also the right to dispose of the goods of the testator towards the payment of his debts and the performance of his will. An executor need not be expressly nominated; and if by necessary implication the testator recommends or commits to one or more the charge and office, or the rights which appertain to an executor, it amounts to as much as the ordaining or constituting him or them to be […]
Read more
“Can Sons Restrain a Mother from Transferring Property? A Legal Analysis under Hindu Law”
CAN SONS FILE SUIT AGAINST MOTHER (HINDU) FOR STAY AGAINST TRANSFER OF SHARES / PROPERTY HELD BY MOTHER IN A FAMILY PROPERTY/ PRIVATE COMPANY ABSOLUTELY TO DAUGHTER? Hindu law prohibits dowry. But dowry is given in one form or another. Hindu Law after 2004 amendment gave equal right to married daughter in father’s property. View of Author Equal property rights for married daughters are an important step toward fairness and gender equality. However, in some families this can also create tensions in relationships. After marriage, daughters may be influenced by their husband or in-laws, and when disputes over property arise, disagreements can escalate into legal battles or serious family conflicts. While the intention behind laws like the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is to ensure justice and equal rights, the practical implementation sometimes leads to strained family ties when expectations about property are unclear or contested. In such situations, disagreements over inheritance may even end up in court or cause long-lasting rifts within families. Therefore, along with legal equality, maintaining open communication, clear property planning, and mutual understanding within families is important to prevent conflicts and preserve relationships. Law makers must prevent this situation resulting into strained relationships. Broken relations makes society psychologically weaker. Continue… with article… Let us see Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act 1956. Property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property.―(1)Any property possessed by a female Hindu, whether acquired before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be held by her as full owner thereof and not as a limited owner. Explanation.―In this sub-section, “property” includes both movable and immovable property acquired by a female Hindu by inheritance or devise, or at a partition, or in lieu of maintenance or arrears of maintenance, or by gift from any person, whether a relative or not, before, at or after her marriage, or by her own skill or exertion, or by purchase or by prescription, or in any other manner whatsoever, and also any such property held by her as stridhana immediately before the commencement of this Act. (2) Nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall apply to any property acquired by way of gift or under a will or any other instrument or under a decree or order of a civil court or under an award where the terms of the gift, will or other instrument or the decree, order or award prescribe a restricted estate in such property. If the shares are the mother’s self-acquired property (bought by her or gifted to her), she has absolute authority to transfer them to anyone she wishes, and the sons have no legal standing to stop her during her lifetime. Section 5 of the said Act provides for exception: Act not to apply to certain properties. ―This Act shall not apply to― (i) any property succession to which is regulated by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ( 39 of 1925), by reason of the provisions contained in section 21 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (43 of 1954); (ii) any estate which descends to a single heir by the terms of any covenant or agreement entered […]
Read more
“No Privilege in the Machine: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Defense”
AI DOCUMENTS ARE PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS? ARE AI‑GENERATED LEGAL DOCUMENTS PRIVILEGED? A COMPARATIVE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE To understand the nuances of the issue under discussion we must know the provisions of the Indian laws. The two main laws applicable during evidence and cross examination oof a witness are the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, and Code of Civil Procedure 1908. Prior to Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, it was The Evidence Act 1872. Professional Communications (Section 126-128, Evidence Act): Attorneys, pleaders, and their employees cannot disclose any communication made by a client, or documents shared, in the course of professional employment without the client’s express consent. Confidentiality Requirement: Privilege only applies to communications made to seek legal advice; it does not protect advice sought for illegal purposes. Client Protection (Section 129, Evidence Act): Clients cannot be compelled to disclose confidential communications with their legal advisors. Spousal Privilege (Section 122, Evidence Act): Communications between husband and wife during marriage are protected, with exceptions like suits between them. Official Communications (Sections 123-124, Evidence Act): Public officers cannot be compelled to disclose communications made in official confidence if it harms public interest. CPC Application: Under the Code of Civil Procedure, if a party is asked to produce a document that is privileged under the Evidence Act, they can object to its production. If a document loses its confidentiality, the privilege is lost. The Query: So, a question arises when a document is drafted by an Artificial Intelligence Application, whether such document or a draft is a privileged document and exempted from cross examination? Now issue arose before a Court in USA. United States v. Heppner in which said that when documents prepared by an AI application same is not a privileged document? If we talk of India, there is no law. However, a warning is issued by the Supreme Court of India not to rely on AI. It was an incident where a lawyer cited Judgements during his arguments, were never passed by any court of law in India. Factual Background On November 4, 2025, Bradley Heppner was arrested on the charges of securities and wire fraud. Pursuant to a search warrant, federal agents searched his residence and seized electronic devices. A forensic review revealed approximately thirty-one documents generated through Heppner’s interactions with “Claude,” a generative AI system operated by an application called Anthropic. The documents contained AI-generated analyses addressing potential defences, legal theories, and litigation strategy related to Heppner’s criminal case. After receiving a grand jury subpoena and retaining counsel, Heppner continued to use Claude independently to analyse the charges, evaluate defences, and draft strategy memoranda. He saved the AI-generated materials on his personal devices and later shared them with his attorneys. During discovery disputes, defence counsel conceded that they neither directed nor supervised Heppner’s use of the AI system and had no role in creating the documents. The government moved to compel production, arguing that the materials were not privileged because they were created through communications with a third-party AI platform without attorney involvement. Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the motion, holding […]
Read more
The Jungle, the Fairy, and the Ballot Box
“The Fairy and the Freebie: How Easy Comfort Weakens a Nation” As soon as Election comes every political party starts disbursing money to the voters. Some offer monthly Rs.70,000/- some offer. The taxpayer is a mute spectator. I will tell you story of a Jungle. The Story of the Jungle Once upon a time, there was a beautiful jungle where all the animals lived peacefully. They worked hard to find their food by hunting and gathering. They shared with one another and cared for each other. The jungle was full of love, cooperation, and happiness. All the animals helped one another and took responsibility for their lives. They were strong, active, and independent. One day, a fairy came to the jungle. She had a magic wand. By waving her wand, she started giving food and water to all the animals and birds. At first, everyone was happy. But slowly, the animals became lazy. Since food was easily available, they stopped working and hunting. They spent most of their time sleeping and eating. Over time, they even found it difficult to walk and run because they were no longer active. After a few months, a hunter entered the jungle. He began hunting the animals recklessly. Earlier, the animals were brave and skilled at escaping or fighting back. But now, because they were weak and lazy, many of them were easily caught in traps. Many animals were hunted. Fear spread throughout the jungle. The King of the Jungle called a meeting. All the animals gathered and discussed what had gone wrong. They realized that the fairy had been sent by the hunter to make them weak and dependent. Because of her magic, they had lost their strength and alertness. They decided to send the fairy away from the jungle. After the fairy was deported, the animals slowly returned to their old habits. They started working hard again, hunting, sharing, and taking care of one another. Soon, the jungle became peaceful and happy once more. Moral of the Story Easy comfort can make us weak. Hard work and self-reliance make us strong. ____________________________________________________________ Freebies and Constitution The legality of election “freebies” in India hinges on balancing Directive Principles (social welfare) with fiscal responsibility under the Constitution. While critics argue they constitute bribery and misuse public funds (violating Art. 266, 282), the Supreme Court in The S. Subramaniam Balaji v. Government of Tamil Nadu (2013) case is a landmark Supreme Court of India judgment regarding electoral freebies. The Court ruled that pre-poll promises in election manifestos do not constitute a “corrupt practice” under Section 123 of the Representation of People Act, 1951, as they are part of a party’s agenda, not individual bribery. The judgment established a distinction between election promises for public welfare and the direct bribery of voters. However, it has been criticized for failing to curb the growing culture of “freebie politics” that threatens state finances. Latest View of Supreme Court: TAMIL NADU POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA | W.P.(C) No. 158/2026 Currently the view of Supreme Court has changed its view. In the above matter CJI Suryakant said […]
Read more
“RERA in India: Repeal or Reform?
SHOULD RERA BE REPEALED? Why we are discussing this topic? The Supreme Court in THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. NARESH SHARMA| SLP(C) No. 005835 – / 2026 CJI Surya Kant said It is high time that all the states should revisit and rethink constituting this authority,” The CJI further remarked that the RERA was not doing any other services except to facilitate builders in default. Let’s study pros and Cons. RERA is useful and effective: The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) brings accountability, transparency, and efficiency to the Indian real estate sector, primarily protecting homebuyers. Key benefits include mandatory project registration, standardized carpet area definitions, 70% of funds kept in an escrow account to prevent diversion, guaranteed timely delivery, and a 5-year defect liability period. Major Positive Points of RERA: Transparency and Disclosure: Promoters must disclose project plans, layout, land title status, and timeline on the RERA website, giving buyers access to verified information. Protection of Funds: Developers are required to deposit 70% of all project funds into a dedicated bank account, ensuring money is only used for that specific project, reducing insolvency risk. Standardized Carpet Area: RERA eliminates confusion by defining “carpet area” clearly, ensuring buyers pay only for the actual usable space, not for common areas or super built-up areas. Builders were selling units/galas/flats even on Super Built Up basis. Timely Delivery and Penalties: Projects must be completed on time. If a developer delays possession, they are liable to pay interest on the amount paid by the buyer, matching the interest rate for buyer default. Defect Liability Period: Builders are responsible for rectifying any structural defects or quality issues reported within 5 years of possession at no extra cost. Reduced Fraud and Misleading Ads: All advertising must adhere to the registered project details. False promises or misleading marketing can lead to penalties. Redressal Mechanism: RERA authorities provide a fast-track, organized, and legal mechanism for settling disputes between buyers, developers, and agents. Consent for Changes: Developers cannot change plans or structure without the consent of two-thirds of the homebuyers. Concluding Notes: RERA has significantly improved buyer confidence, increased project efficiency, and bYes—**before the introduction of RERA in India**, this kind of malpractice was unfortunately quite common in the real estate sector. ROLE OF REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (INDIA) Before RERA came into force (around 2016–2017), there was no strong centralized regulator, which allowed many builders to exploit buyers. What Used to Happen Before RERA Blank or Incomplete Agreements Builders often made buyers sign blank or partially filled agreements Later, terms were changed without the buyer’s consent. Buyers had little legal protection. Multiple Sales of the Same Flat. Blank document was signed and genuine buyer in possession was not aware of the same. Some builders sold **one flat to 5–10 people** using: Duplicate allotment letters Fake agreements Backdated documents Especially common when buyers paid in cash or instalments. Mix of Investors and Loan Buyers: Builder was taking loans from investors in cash against blank agreement. Such funds were cash. Investors were given early “soft bookings” without registration. Genuine buyers took bank loans […]
Read more
India’s Emerging AI Hub
Vizag: India’s Emerging Metro City of Opportunity Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India, recently inaugurated the world’s largest AI Impact Summit, attended by global leaders in artificial intelligence and advanced technologies. The summit highlighted India’s growing leadership in AI, semiconductors, and high-performance computing. Among India’s rising technology hubs, Visakhapatnam (Vizag) is rapidly transforming into a global center for artificial intelligence and data infrastructure. 🌐 Vizag’s Transformation into a Global Data City Located in Andhra Pradesh, Vizag is emerging as one of the world’s largest AI data center hubs, driven by an estimated $15 billion investment from Google and other major industry leaders. This ambitious “Data City” initiative aims to build more than 2.5 GW+ of digital infrastructure capacity, positioning Vizag as a cornerstone of India’s digital economy. 🔹 Key Partners and Investments Google Developing its largest AI data center outside the United States in Vizag. AdaniConnex A joint venture between Adani Enterprises and EdgeConneX, focused on creating a 1GW+ AI-driven data center ecosystem. Reliance–BrookfieldPlatform A collaboration between Reliance Industries and Brookfield Asset Management, contributing to large-scale infrastructure development. 📍 Location and Scope Project Area: Madhurawada–Kapuluppada corridor Land Area: ~500 acres Purpose: Dedicated technology and data center cluster This region is being developed as a future-ready digital and innovation zone. ⚡ Capacity, Timeline, and Vision Target Capacity: 2.5 GW+ Implementation Period: 2026–2030 Goal: Establish Vizag as a leading global AI and cloud computing hub The initiative will significantly strengthen India’s digital sovereignty and computing capabilities. 🌱 Advanced Features Integration of renewable and green energy systems Subsea cable landing stations for global connectivity High-performance AI and machine learning infrastructure Smart grid and cooling technologies These features ensure sustainability and global competitiveness. 👩💼 Economic and Employment Impact Creation of thousands of direct and indirect jobs Growth in IT services, construction, logistics, and support industries Boost to local entrepreneurship and skill development Increased foreign direct investment Vizag is set to become a major employment and innovation hub for the region. 🌍 Global Competitiveness With these developments, Vizag is positioning itself to compete with established global data center clusters such as Northern Virginia, one of the world’s largest digital infrastructure hubs. 🚀 Conclusion The Vizag Data City initiative represents a landmark step in India’s journey toward technological leadership. Backed by global corporations, strong government support, and sustainable infrastructure, Visakhapatnam is poised to become: Shruti Desai 17th February 2026
Read more
From Demonetisation to Digital Currency: How India Led the Global Shift Toward Sovereign Digital Money
From Demonetisation to Digital Currency: How India Led the Global Shift Toward Sovereign Digital Money India is a visionary nation. India had a serious problem of terrorism and funding terrorism through fake currency notes. India, to abate terrorism, opted for demonetisation on 8th November 2016. India introduced digital payment platforms simultaneously. We now have Bharat Pay, G Pay and even every bank has started their UPI. India has shown the world the path towards a digital world. Now, the west side of the globe is following India’s footsteps. USA PASSES LAW OF REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF DIGITAL CURRENCY: The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, signed into law in July 2025, establishes the first comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in the United States. It mandates 100% reserve backing, strict, liquidity requirements, and brings issuers under Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance. Key Aspects of the GENIUS Act (2025-2026): Purpose: To foster innovation in digital assets while protecting consumers and ensuring financial stability. Reserve Requirements: Requires stablecoins to be backed 1:1 by high-quality, liquid assets, such as U.S. dollars or short-term Treasury bills. Issuer Regulation: Only permitted issuers can create payment stablecoins; they must adhere to capital and risk management rules. Consumer Protection: Guarantees redemption rights for stablecoin holders and mandates public disclosures of reserves. Compliance: Subjects issuers to anti-money laundering (AML), countering the financing of terrorism (CFT), and sanction requirements. International Scope: Foreign issuers targeting U.S. users are held to the same standards as domestic issuers. The Treasury Department is actively implementing the law, with public comment periods regarding the regulation of these digital assets extending into late 2025 Overview of U.S. Monetary Evolution The U.S. monetary system has undergone major changes, including: Early issuance of private bank and Treasury currencies. Creation of the Federal Reserve in 1914 as the sole currency issuer. Abandonment of gold and silver convertibility after 1933. These shifts were controversial decisions and actions but are now widely accepted. Emergence of Digital Currencies and CBDC Debate Private digital currencies (e.g., Bitcoin) and foreign CBDCs have prompted U.S. policy debates. A Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is the digital form of a nation’s sovereign currency, issued and regulated by the central bank (e.g., RBI’s “Digital Rupee” or e₹). It acts as legal tender, is interchangeable 1:1 with physical cash, and is designed to make transactions faster, cheaper, and more secure. Key Aspects of CBDCs: Types: Divided into Retail (CBDC-R) for public use and Wholesale (CBDC-W) for interbank settlements. Storage: Held in digital wallets provided by banks, offering 24/7 transactions. Global Status: Over 130 countries, representing 98% of global GDP, are exploring or have launched CBDCs, driven by the need for enhanced digital payment efficiency. Digital Currency Vs. Crypto: Unlike cryptocurrencies, CBDCs are centralised, backed by the state, and not volatile. Goals: Reduce cash-handling costs, improve financial inclusion, and increase cross-border payment efficiency. Key questions include: Whether the Federal Reserve should issue a CBDC. Whether a CBDC would fundamentally change the financial system or simply modernise it. USA Congress has held several hearings and proposed multiple CBDC-related bills in recent sessions. Purpose of the […]
Read more
Digital Euro Initiative: Modernizing Payments and Ensuring Monetary Sovereignty in Europe
Digital Euro Initiative: Modernizing Payments and Ensuring Monetary Sovereignty in Europe European Central Bank (ECB) is driving the digital euro initiative to modernize payments, ensure monetary sovereignty, and complement, not replace, cash. Following completed technical preparations, the project entered a two-year preparation phase in November 2023. A potential rollout is targeted for 2029, with pilot projects expected in 2027 pending legislative approval. Overview • On 28 June, the European Commission proposed legislation to create a legal framework for a digital euro. • The digital euro would be a central bank–issued digital currency designed to complement cash. • It aims to strengthen European retail payments and support the euro’s international role. Objectives • Maintain public access to central bank money in a digital economy. • Respond to declining cash use. • Promote financial inclusion, competition, and innovation. • Enable payments where cash cannot be used, such as online. Relationship with Cash • The digital euro will not replace physical cash. • It is meant to coexist with banknotes and coins. • A parallel proposal protects cash’s legal tender status and accessibility. • Users remain free to choose their payment method. Regulatory Framework • The draft regulation covers: o Legal tender status o Privacy and data protection o Anti-money laundering rules o Distribution and access o Financial stability o International use • The framework is “enabling,” setting core rules without fixing final design details. Digital Euro vs. Bank Deposits • Digital euro: o Issued by the ECB o Liability of the central bank o Similar in nature to cash • Bank account money: o Issued by commercial banks o Private-sector liability • The digital euro may allow offline, proximity payments. Access and User Services • Provided through banks and authorized payment providers. • Alternatives available for people without bank accounts. • Users can switch providers. • Basic services for individuals are free, including: o Account management o Balance checks o Funding and withdrawals o Transfers and payments Privacy Protections • User data handled by service providers, not the ECB. • The ECB will not see users’ identities. • Offline payments offer privacy similar to cash. Holding Limits • Limits may be set to: o Protect monetary and financial stability o Prevent money laundering o Fight terrorism financing Programmability • No automatic restrictions on how money is spent. • Users control how they use their funds. • Conditional payments are possible. Legislative Process and Next Steps • The proposal follows extensive consultations. • It requires approval by the European Parliament and Council. • After adoption, the ECB will decide: o Whether to issue the digital euro o When to launch it o Which design features to adopt Complementary Measures • A separate proposal ensures continued access to cash. • Together, both initiatives aim to guarantee reliable access to public money in all forms. Website: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/euro/digital_euro/html/index.en.html #prof Key aspects of the digital euro : • Strategic Priority: Aimed at strengthening Europe’s financial independence amidst rising private digital currencies and foreign payment solutions. • Key Features: Designed to be a free-of-charge, secure, and instant method for both online and offline payments across the euro area. […]
Read more
Monetary Power in the 21st Century: Theories, and The Rise and Resilience of the Dollar
Monetary Power in the 21st Century: Theories and The Rise and Resilience of the Dollar Printing more dollars hits the US economy hard because it increases the money supply without a corresponding increase in the actual goods and services produced, leading to devaluation and higher prices When the Federal Reserve prints money (or creates it digitally through quantitative easing), it devalues the existing currency, which reduces purchasing power and causes inflation. Here is how printing money hurts the economy: High Inflation: When more money chases the same amount of goods, prices for everyday items rise, as demonstrated in 2021-2022 when high money supply growth led to sharp inflation. Decreased Purchasing Power: As inflation rises, each dollar buys fewer goods and services. This is particularly harmful to consumers, as their wages and savings no longer stretch as far, reducing their standard of living. Erosion of Savings: Inflation act as a “hidden tax” on cash holders. Those with savings, particularly on fixed incomes, see the real value of their money plummet. Loss of Investor Confidence: Excessive, uncontrolled money printing can lead to a loss of faith in the US dollar. If investors believe the currency will continue to lose value, they may shift to more stable assets, reducing the demand for dollars globally. Currency Devaluation Risk: Persistent printing can cause the dollar to weaken against other currencies, making imports more expensive and contributing to trade imbalances. Increased National Debt: When the government prints money to finance spending, it increases the national debt. As the debt grows, it becomes harder for the government to service its obligations without further debasing the currency. Market Bubbles: The influx of money often flows into stocks and real estate rather than into the productive economy, creating asset price bubbles that can lead to financial instability. While printing money can provide a temporary economic boost during a recession, it can cause significant long-term damage if it becomes an addictive tool for handling debt, with historical cases like Germany in the 1920s and Zimbabwe in the 2000s highlighting how it can destroy an economy. THEORY PROPELLED BY VARIOUS ECONOMIST. The concept of printing currency is a highly debated topic among leading economists. On one side, traditional theory stress the importance of maintaining monetary stability, while more modern perspectives support using debt-financed spending to stimulate the economy. At the heart of this debate is the challenge of finding the right balance between leveraging money creation to boost economic activity and managing the potential risks of inflation Here are the primary theories and the authors associated with them: 1. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) MMT, which gained prominence in the 2010s, argues that governments that issue their own fiat currency (like the US, UK, Japan, and Canada) are not constrained by revenue when it comes to spending. Therefore, they can, and should, print money to fund public services and maintain full employment. Key Authors/Proponents: Warren Mosler (who authored The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy and Soft Currency Economics), Stephanie Kelton (The Deficit Myth), L. Randall Wray, and Bill Mitchell. Core Theory: Sovereign governments cannot go broke and do not need […]
Read more
“DE-DOLLARIZATION: DIVERSIFYING FOR A RESILIENT FUTURE”
“DE-DOLLARIZATION: DIVERSIFYING FOR A RESILIENT FUTURE” De-dollarization refers to the process by which countries, institutions, and companies reduce their reliance on the U.S. dollar in international trade, finance, and reserves. In practical terms, it means: Using other currencies (like the euro, yuan, or local currencies) instead of the dollar for trade and payments Holding fewer U.S. dollars in central bank reserves Issuing debt and pricing commodities in non-dollar currencies Settling financial transactions outside the dollar-based system Key idea: Structural vs. Cyclical Demand Structural demand (long-term) This is about the dollar’s role as the world’s main reserve and transaction currency. It includes: Dominance in foreign exchange markets Use in global commodities (oil, gas, metals) Currency used for international loans and bonds Share of global central bank reserves De-dollarization mainly targets this structural role. If it happens meaningfully, the dollar’s global influence weakens over time. Cyclical demand (short-term) This is driven by economic cycles and market trends, such as: Strong U.S. economic growth High U.S. interest rates Strong stock market performance Global investors seeking “safe assets” Recently, strong U.S. performance (“U.S. exceptionalism”) has increased demand for dollars. Investors hold more USD because U.S. assets looked more attractive. A weaker dollar in the future doesn’t automatically mean de-dollarization. It may just reflect changing market conditions. Why countries pursue de-dollarization? As of early 2026, the USA actively imposes financial and trade sanctions via the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). Key targeted countries include Russia, Iran, Cuba, North Korea, Syria, and Venezuela, aiming to restrict trade, influence behavior, and protect national security. Recent actions involve targeting entities linked to Iran’s energy trade, including firms in India, China, and the UAE. Countries may want to reduce dollar dependence to: Avoid U.S. sanctions and financial pressure Reduce exposure to U.S. monetary policy Increase financial sovereignty Strengthen their own currencies Examples include China, Russia, and some BRICS countries promoting trade in local currencies. BRICS SUMMIT 2024 INDIA’S APPROACH ON THE ISSUE The central bank of India, Reserve Bank of India, erstwhile Governor Shaktikanta Das, stated in December 2024 that dedollarization for India was only a part of “derisking” Indian trade and reducing dependence on any one currency since that may become “problematic”. While a BRICS currency had been raised by a member state, nothing specific was decided. He also compared the Euro and stated how nations in Euro countries are located in proximity, while that is not the case with BRICS.This was in response to a question about President-elect Trump warning about tariffs. Former ambassador D. Bala Venkatesh Varma, in an interview with the think tank India Foundation, states that India’s stance in BRICS is “pro-India” and “claiming that BRICS is dominated by China is an exaggeration”. ( wikipedia) US Gold Reserves: Stability, Not Decline US gold reserves have remained unchanged for decades, currently at 8,133.46 tonnes (about $11.041 billion at official valuation). The US remains the world’s largest official holder of gold, accounting for over a quarter of global central bank gold reserves. While the US gold stock is stable, other countries—especially China, Russia, and several emerging markets—have accelerated […]
Read moreTHE U.S. DOLLAR’S JOURNEY: BUILDING AND SUSTAINING GLOBAL SUPREMACY
America rules the world because trade is dominated by dollar. The U.S. dollar’s dominance stems from the massive, stable U.S. economy, its deep and liquid financial markets (like US Treasury markets), the rule of law, and trust in American institutions, solidified by the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement that pegged other currencies to the dollar, backed by gold. Even after abandoning the gold standard, its role as the primary currency for global trade (especially oil), its role as a safe haven in crises, and the established infrastructure for dollar transactions (like SWIFT) cemented its status, giving the U.S. unique financial power. The 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement, signed by 44 nations alliance in New Hampshire, which was established after-WWII to run and manage international monetary system based on fixed exchange rates, with the U.S. dollar pegged to gold ($35/ounce) and other currencies pegged to the dollar. It created the IMF and World Bank to foster stability, lasting until 1971 The Bretton Woods Framework: Foundations of Modern Global Finance In July 1944, nearly 730 representatives from 44 countries gathered at Bretton Woods to design a stable and efficient system for international currency exchange, discourage harmful currency devaluations, and encourage global economic development. The resulting Bretton Woods Agreement was instrumental in achieving these aims, establishing the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank as key institutions. Although the original Bretton Woods system ended in the 1970s, both the IMF and World Bank continue to play essential roles in supporting international currency exchange and maintaining global financial stability. ( curtsy National WWII Museum) Harry Dexter White: Architect of Bretton Woods and Controversial Legacy Harry Dexter White played a pivotal role in shaping the Bretton Woods Agreement, which led to the creation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. As a government economist, White was instrumental in designing the postwar global economic order and contributed significantly to establishing the United States as a dominant world power. Despite these achievements, his legacy has often been clouded by allegations of espionage, with claims that he acted as a Soviet spy. While these accusations have persisted over time, they remain unproven, and some evidence suggests his innocence. Bretton Woods 1944: The Birth of Modern Global Finance Two major institutions were created: The International Monetary Fund (IMF), tasked with monitoring exchange rates and providing short-term loans to countries facing balance-of-payments deficits. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD/World Bank), designed to finance postwar reconstruction and economic development. The agreement delivered nearly three decades of monetary stability for Western economies, fostering international trade. However, it ultimately collapsed in 1971 when the U.S. ended dollar-to-gold convertibility. Despite this, the institutions founded at Bretton Woods remain central pillars of the global financial system today. The Nixon Shock: What Happened? On August 15, 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon announced a series of sweeping economic measures that fundamentally changed the global financial system. The most significant of these was the unilateral suspension of the U.S. dollar’s convertibility into gold, effectively ending the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates that had governed international finance since World War II. [en.wikipedia.org] Key […]
Read more